Now apart from this being very simplistic, it's also rather patronising. So the 800,000+ 'No' voters are dumb animals who haven't the mental capacity to think it through? I would have to say I was initially in favour of Congestion Charging in principle, but on looking into it, and into Manchester's proposal in particular, I changed my mind. Here's why:
- The suggested improvements to Metrolink basically involve 12 miles of new track that don't go anywhere I need to go, plus a few more carriages on a massively overcrowded system. Plus Metrolink is nowhere near where I live.
- Bus and cycle lanes actually increase congestion, since there is less space on the roads.
- More buses in the early mornings and late evenings? If there's a demand for them, why are they not already there, providing more profits for the bus companies?
- Train improvements seem limited to a few extra carriages, a couple of new stations and more CCTV.
- To enforce the scheme, there would be £300 million of new cameras. Is it just me that sees that amount of money as obscene?
- The route of the 'inner charging ring' was never clearly defined or shown on any of the literature sent out about the charge, but was clearly a LOT bigger than what most people would define as the city centre.
- If I wanted to go away for the weekend (reducing Manchester's congestion!) I would have to pay for the privelege of leaving Manchester.
- There would be a unified payment system for public transport in Manchester, similar to London's Oystercard. This would actually be a good thing.
- Many of the posters for the 'Yes' campaign talked about reduced bus fares. But in the detail of the proposal, there was NO commitment to doing this.
- Congestion charging in London has not worked. Congestion has already returned to the previous levels within just a few years.
- Many businesses have no choice but to use vehicles at peak times. So many of them would potentially go under due to this charge.
- Crucially, since it would be car drivers who paid the charge, there was NO improvement to roads as part of the scheme.